Re: The future of built-in geometric data types

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The future of built-in geometric data types
Date: 2004-09-02 04:49:47
Message-ID: 20040902044947.GB19537@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:52:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm pretty clueless in regard to the PostGIS situation. Will it be
> > integrated with PostgreSQL in the future?
>
> No. Wrong license.

If the license were changed to be BSD compatible, are there other
barriers to adoption?

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message chinni 2004-09-02 06:34:56 plpgsql function
Previous Message Thomas F.O'Connell 2004-09-02 03:56:39 Re: Understanding pg_autovacuum CPU Usage