On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 08:23:14AM -0400, Jerry Sievers wrote:
> As I recall, there is a comment in the release notes somewhere between
> your PG version and the current one, that int cols no longer take
> empty string as NULL.
IIRC, an empty string was interpreted as a zero, never as a NULL.
It is now (rightfully) rejected...
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Benjamin Smith||Date: 2004-08-26 02:43:03|
|Subject: Constraints to Guarantee unique across tables with foreign key?|
|Previous:||From: Jan Wieck||Date: 2004-08-26 02:27:15|
|Subject: Re: Problem to connect to the Windows Port|