Re: libpq build problem with <io.h> on MS VC++

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > The only other option I can think of is to #undef those to defines,
> > include io.h, then re-include port.h? Is that better?
>
> How about not #define'ing rename() etc in port.h in the first place?
>
> We could put
> #ifdef WIN32
> #define rename(x) pgrename(x)
> #endif
> into those very few .c files that need it. (I'm assuming that
> forgetting to include this in a file that calls rename() will yield an
> obvious build failure on Windows --- if not then the idea is no good.)

I think they have rename --- it just isn't reliable like ours is.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073