Re: [HACKERS] fsync vs open_sync

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fsync vs open_sync
Date: 2004-08-10 17:18:32
Message-ID: 200408101018.32327.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Guys, just so you know:

OSDL did some testing and found Ext3 to be perhaps the worst FS for PostgreSQL
-- although this testing was with the default options. Ext3 involved an
almost 40% write performance penalty compared with Ext2, whereas the penalty
for ReiserFS and JFS was less than 10%.

This concurs with my personal experience.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-08-10 17:23:28 Re: Column order performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-10 16:53:10 Re: insert waits for delete with trigger