From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |
Date: | 2004-08-09 01:56:14 |
Message-ID: | 200408081856.14009.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches |
8.0 beta CVS of 8/8/2004:
If a relative path is used for the -L option in initdb, the following fatal
error happens:
./initdb -D ../data -L ../share/postgresql/
<snip>
creating system views ... ok
loading pg_description ... ERROR: could not open file
"../share/postgresql/postgres.description" for reading: No such file or
directory
child process exited with exit code 1
Is this intentional? The first dozen or so commands work fine with a relative
path, and this executes fine with an absolute path for both -D and -L.
SuSE 9.1, GCC 3.3.3
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-09 04:14:30 | Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2004-08-07 18:29:07 | Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] casting strings to multidimensional arrays yields |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-08-09 02:23:00 | Re: PITR on Win32 - Archive and Restore |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-08-09 01:51:16 | Re: [PATCHES] That dump-comments-on-composite-type-columns patch... |