| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: win32 readline |
| Date: | 2004-08-02 20:36:22 |
| Message-ID: | 200408022236.22502.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Stupid question, but for Windows ... how many will actually use psql,
> vs something like PgAdmin?
I don't see any reason to believe that it would be significantly less
than now.
> I'd say revisit it later myself ... it
> isn't critical to the operation of the server, only a 'luxury item'
> that we've all gotten used to being there :)
By that logic, approximately 37% of all features count as luxury items.
:)
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-02 20:38:26 | Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-08-02 20:27:06 | Re: win32 readline |