Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Point in Time Recovery

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Point in Time Recovery
Date: 2004-07-29 17:03:02
Message-ID: 200407291703.i6TH32J14851@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> I was wondering about this point - might it not be just as reasonable 
> for the copied file to *be* an exact image of pg_control?  Then a very 
> simple variant of pg_controldata (or maybe even just adding switches to 
> pg_controldata itself) would enable the relevant info to be extracted

We didn't do that so admins could easily read the file contents.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-07-29 17:05:47
Subject: Re: more signals (was: Function to kill backend)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-07-29 17:01:46
Subject: Re: more signals (was: Function to kill backend)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group