From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: more signals (was: Function to kill backend) |
Date: | 2004-07-29 17:01:46 |
Message-ID: | 200407291701.i6TH1kB14639@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> > ftok() on pg_control or something in the clusters data directory was my
> > intention. (Again, just one message queue)
>
> Doesn't work; you have to be able to cope with collisions with
> previously existing queue IDs ... so in practice the queue ID has to
> be treated as quasi-random. See the semaphore ID selection logic
> we use now.
>
> I tend to agree with Bruce's nearby comment that we shouldn't be trying
> to solve this now. I'd vote for commenting out the session-kill
> function for 7.5, and revisiting the issue sometime in future.
I already have it on the TODO list.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-29 17:03:02 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-29 17:00:50 | Re: more signals (was: Function to kill backend) |