Re: Point in Time Recovery

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Point in Time Recovery
Date: 2004-07-15 23:17:07
Message-ID: 200407152317.i6FNH7K10540@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 15:57, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > We will get there --- it just seems dark at this time.
>
> Thanks for that. My comments were heartfelt, but not useful right now.
>
> I'm badly overdrawn already on my time budget, though that is my concern
> alone. There is more to do than I have time for. Pragmatically, if we
> aren't going to get there then I need to stop now, so I can progress
> other outstanding issues. All help is appreciated.
>
> I'm aiming for the minimum feature set - which means we do need to take
> care over whether that set is insufficient and also to pull any part
> that doesn't stand up to close scrutiny over the next few days.

As you can see, we are still chewing on NT. What PITR features are
missing? I assume because we can't stop file system writes during
backup that we will need a backup parameter file like I described. Is
there anything else that PITR needs?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glen Parker 2004-07-15 23:19:28 Re: Point in Time Recovery
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2004-07-15 23:13:20 Re: Point in Time Recovery