| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Point in Time Recovery |
| Date: | 2004-07-15 23:07:35 |
| Message-ID: | 200407152307.i6FN7Z609454@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 23:18, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
>
> Thanks for the vote of confidence, on or off list.
>
> > too many people spend a lot of
> > money for proprietary databases, just for some missing features in
> > PostgreSQL
>
> Agreed - PITR isn't aimed at existing users of PostgreSQL. If you use it
> already, even though it doesn't have it, then you are quite likely to be
> able to keep going without it.
>
> Most commercial users won't touch anything that doesn't have PITR.
Agreed. I am surprised at how few requests we have gotten for PITR. I
assume people are either using replication or not considering us.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-07-15 23:12:30 | Re: Note about robustness of transaction-related data structures |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-07-15 23:01:33 | Re: Point in Time Recovery |