Re: Proposal for detecting encoding mismatch in initdb

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal for detecting encoding mismatch in initdb
Date: 2004-07-13 22:54:33
Message-ID: 200407140054.33519.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> The behavioral description sounds fine, but I was eagerly awaiting
> your description of exactly how you'd test for compatibility or
> search for a compatible encoding ... without that algorithm the whole
> thing's moot.

It's just an explicit list of things that spell similarly. There's not
much more we can do, but I don't see any obvious candidates were this
could lead to trouble.

> BTW, what happens if there is more than one apparently-matching
> encoding? (It might be best to error out in this case, on the theory
> that we evidently don't have a correct matching.)

I just won't put something like that into the list.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-13 22:56:08 Re: serverlog rotation/functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-07-13 22:53:56 Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)