| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PITR Archive Recovery plus WIP PITR |
| Date: | 2004-07-13 22:58:20 |
| Message-ID: | 200407132258.i6DMwKB15488@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> New release of patch, at v5_1 ... for serious testing
> what's in
> - Point in Time Recovery now works....please check carefully
> - additional options in recovery.conf
> (including code contributed to PITR from Klaus Naumann)
>
> what's not (yet)
> - Timelines...though I think they are useful, they may not be critical
I am not fond of the timeline idea, especially for 7.5. Let's get usage
cases submitted first. I can imagine timelines as causing significant
confusion during restore, which is the last thing we want to do.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-13 23:00:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Is "trust" really a good default? |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2004-07-13 22:56:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Is "trust" really a good default? |