| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report) |
| Date: | 2004-07-14 00:49:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20040713213305.L789@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> We could certainly do something along that line if we had a few people
> willing to be "gatekeepers". We'd have to work harder at making the
> release generation process open and documented though. Right now there
> are plenty of steps that only you, Bruce, or Lamar (respectively) know
> how to do...
I think we could do it if we restricted it to *just* one release back ...
but I do agree with Peter about ppls motivations for upgrading (bug fixes
vs new features) ... we'd have to have a 'two branch stable', one would be
only bug fixes, the other would be bug fixes+feature backpatch ... would
could get interesting trying to figure out release naming conventions :)
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-14 01:19:37 | Re: serverlog rotation/functions |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-07-14 00:30:45 | Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report) |