Re: Is "trust" really a good default?

From: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is "trust" really a good default?
Date: 2004-07-13 21:48:00
Message-ID: 200407131748.00592.lowen@pari.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Monday 12 July 2004 17:10, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> IMO, forcing su password at initdb time (allowing blank password with a
> very stern warning) and bumping localhost to auth is the right way to
> go. As far as RPM's, etc. I don't think RPM considerations should be
> driving security concerns.

FWIW, the RPMs default to ident authentication, and trust is off. This is
however done as a patch to the sample pg_hba.conf. A command line switch to
initdb to mung up an ident default would be fine with me, though.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-13 21:56:13 Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-07-13 21:46:11 Re: Release planning (was: Re: Status report)