Re: compile errors in new PL/Pler

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: compile errors in new PL/Pler
Date: 2004-07-06 02:13:56
Message-ID: 20040705231323.P71486@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>
>> So we have three choices as I see it:
>> 1) revert the change
>> 2) require some minimally recent version of perl
>> 3) fix the issue in place
>>
>> Preferences?
>>
>> Joshua/Andrew -- do you want to take a shot at making this work on perl
>> 5.00503?
>
> I personally don't have any desire to make this work on a version of perl
> that the perl community itself suggests that you should upgrade.

Well, backing it out is always an option, since the old version apparently
did work *shrug*

Personally, rather have the new on in there though ... :)

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-07-06 03:26:08 Re: Bug with view definitions?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-07-06 00:05:17 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: plperl update from Andrew Dunstan, deriving (I believe)