Re: Improving postgresql.conf

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Improving postgresql.conf
Date: 2004-06-16 16:16:41
Message-ID: 20040616161641.GZ11196@ns.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Greg Stark (gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu) wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > The only real problem I see is that showing all the values as comments
> > encourages the idea that you can undo a change by undoing your edit.
> > The simple and obvious fix is to not show the values as comments ...
>
> Well even if you don't show them (and it would be most frustrating for users
> if you don't) it's certainly expected that commenting something out returns it
> to the default value. It's how just about every other piece of software works.
> I can lend my own experience as one data point that I was totally surprised
> when I found out it didn't work the way I expected.

I was suprised too. I havn't tested yet, but do even other things act
this way? I'm thinking mainly of pg_hba.conf which I didn't think did,
but not sure.

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-06-16 16:32:01 Re: Improving postgresql.conf
Previous Message Greg Stark 2004-06-16 16:06:09 Re: Improving postgresql.conf