Martino Serri wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > That is very strange. I assume you are on an i386 cpu. Many are running
> > the same configuration just fine.
> Thank you for the answer.
> Yes, this is a PentiumIII 800Mhz.
> I've searched on /src/include/storage/s_lock.h and i've found this line.
> #ifdef HAVE_SPINLOCKS
> #error PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this ...
> I suppose that would be
> #ifndef HAVE_SPINLOCKS
> It's correct?
No, that would mean it would use the spinlock code (slow) rather than
the test and set code. What OS is this? My guess is that there is a
missing spinlock configuration variable in proper src/template file.
This is all redesigned in 7.5.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: PostgreSQL Bugs List||Date: 2004-06-15 00:52:20|
|Subject: BUG #1165: ECPG can't parse dynamic SQL with indicator|
|Previous:||From: PostgreSQL Bugs List||Date: 2004-06-14 23:08:37|
|Subject: BUG #1164: Informix compatibility ecpg|