From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fixed directory locations in installs |
Date: | 2004-05-19 00:39:02 |
Message-ID: | 200405190039.i4J0d2s25479@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > > What use could printing the relative path possibly have?
> >
> > Debugging. If I can't see it, I *know* I'm going to wish I could.
>
> Well, you can just look inside, it's not that big. Supporting extra
> options might make the script twice as big and thus make it harder to
> just look at the whole thing.
OK, this is a followup from Peter on the pg_config issue. We only do a
relative path if they used the defaults and put it all under a single
directory so there is probably little need for a pg_config addition.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2004-05-19 00:45:30 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-19 00:38:19 | Re: bitwise and/or aggregate functions? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-19 15:12:53 | Re: Changing postgresql.conf values without restarting the postmaster? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-19 00:37:45 | Re: Fixed directory locations in installs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-19 00:40:21 | Re: new aggregate functions v3 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-05-19 00:37:45 | Re: Fixed directory locations in installs |