| From: | sdv mailer <sdvmailer(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pg(at)rbt(dot)ca, scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com, steve(at)blighty(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup |
| Date: | 2004-05-12 14:54:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20040512145416.34836.qmail@web60205.mail.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I ran the new Pgpool-1.2.2 and it was a bit faster on
the TCP but still slower than on UNIX socket. I used
the same script as before.
TCP Socket (Pgpool 1.2.0)
----------
2.39 sec
TCP Socket (Pgpool 1.2.2)
----------
0.80 sec
0.80 sec
0.79 sec
UNIX Socket (Pgpool 1.2.2)
-----------
0.026 sec
0.027 sec
0.027 sec
Direct TCP connection (no pgpool)
---------------------------------
0.16 sec
0.15 sec
0.16 sec
PgPool on TCP is still slower than direct connection
but much faster than v1.2. Any other areas that can be
improved?
Regards,
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2'
http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2004-05-12 14:55:34 | Re: Subtle pg_dump problem... |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2004-05-12 14:49:52 | threads stuff/UnixWare |