| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Weird prepared stmt behavior |
| Date: | 2004-05-04 13:12:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20040504131219.GB2417@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 12:03:16AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> > Right. But note that Tom wants to distinguish between statements
> > created via PREPARE (which would rollback) from those created via a
> > Prepare message (which wouldn't).
>
> Actually, no, I'd prefer not to make such a distinction; I'd be happy
> with SQL-level PREPARE being nontransactional. I'd be willing to put up
> with that distinction if someone shows it's needed, but so far there's
> not been a really good argument advanced for it, has there?
Will do.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"I would rather have GNU than GNOT." (ccchips, lwn.net/Articles/37595/)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-05-04 13:17:18 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-04 12:06:02 | Re: inconsistent owners in newly created databases? |