Re: mingw regression test fixes

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: mingw regression test fixes
Date: 2004-05-03 06:51:45
Message-ID: 200405030851.45866.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Claudio Natoli wrote:
> Peter, did you mean $host_platform by any chance... as originally
> submitted? I see no use of $build_platform anywhere, and as committed
> this plain fails.

I meant that $build_platform would be better than `uname`, not that my
word is to be taken blindly without testing. But...

>
> I don't see why there is any need for discussion over this. There are
> 3 cases statements preceding this one, all of which use
> $host_platform. The one immediately preceding it does the very same
> thing for DIFFFLAGS!

... that is a very good argument for $host_platform as originally
proposed.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Natoli 2004-05-03 07:22:18 Re: Fixed directory locations in installs
Previous Message Claudio Natoli 2004-05-03 06:12:06 win32: whitespace in dir names, shmem bug