Re: win32 binaries

Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > My personal feeling is that the win32 port has turned a corner; in
> most
> > > respects it is usable and stable. Do you think there is any merit
> to
> > > the idea of putting a binary release of the cvs compile on the win32
> > > status page (just a zip of local/pgsql, with instructions to add
> > > appropriate folders to the path, run intdb/postmaster).
> >
> > Could we get it build daily? It is still changing every few days.
>
> I have no problem writing some instructions and doing some compiles,
> unless you think this could be better done in some other fashion.

In the past we had automated tar builds, but binary builds are harder to
automate. If it was updated once a week, that would be enough.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073