| From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shachar Shemesh <psql(at)shemesh(dot)biz> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: License question |
| Date: | 2004-04-23 05:50:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20040422224521.Y4967@megazone.bigpanda.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >You can take some Postgres pieces and use them in a project with a
> >different overall license, but those pieces are still under BSD license.
> >
> >
> But that's not the BSD license.
[...]
> The BSD license, in contrast to PostgreSQL's, does NOT require me to
> copy license related texts around, only the copyrights themselves. It
From the BSD license template on the OSI site:
# Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
# Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
So, afaics, it *does* require you to copy the list of conditions along
with the files.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Garamond | 2004-04-23 06:05:21 | Re: [HACKERS] What can we learn from MySQL? |
| Previous Message | Shachar Shemesh | 2004-04-23 04:53:35 | Re: License question |