| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SQL Spec Compliance Questions |
| Date: | 2004-04-03 23:24:42 |
| Message-ID: | 200404040124.42465.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-sql |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> > 4.16.2 Referenceable tables, subtables, and supertables
> > A table BT whose row type is derived from a structured type
> > ST is called a typed table. Only a base table or a view can be a
> > typed table. A typed table has columns corresponding, in name and
> > declared type, to every attribute of ST and one other column REFC
> > that is the self-referencing column of BT; let REFCN be the
> >
> > I really don't quite understand this, but I don't think we have it
> > ;-)
>
> Ye Gods and Little Fishes!!
>
> Was the SQL99 Committee smoking crack, or what? What the heck is
> that *for*?
Object/relational mapping?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-04-03 23:26:25 | Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions |
| Previous Message | Andrew Payne | 2004-04-02 20:35:50 | Re: Aberdeen Study on OS RDBMS: exceprts and |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-04-03 23:26:25 | Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions |
| Previous Message | Gregor Rot | 2004-04-03 15:08:34 | Re: order of results |