Re: execute command tag including affected rows count

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: execute command tag including affected rows count
Date: 2004-03-22 03:33:53
Message-ID: 200403220333.i2M3XrA00390@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> On 21-Mar-04, at 11:39 AM, Kris Jurka wrote:
> > Would it be possible to have the command completion tag for EXECUTE
> > return
> > the affected row count?
>
> Yes, this has been suggested before -- for example:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org/msg26787.html
>
> I agree it would be a good idea, although I can't recall what the
> conclusion of the previous discussions was -- did anyone raise any
> critical objections to this?

Should this be a TODO?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2004-03-22 03:36:19 Re: pg_autovacuum next steps
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2004-03-22 03:21:07 Re: pg_autovacuum next steps