Re: Doxygen?

From: Jonathan Gardner <jgardner(at)jonathangardner(dot)net>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Doxygen?
Date: 2004-03-17 18:45:57
Message-ID: 200403171045.57470.jgardner@jonathangardner.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday 17 March 2004 12:34 am, Dave Page wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jonathan Gardner [mailto:jgardner(at)jonathangardner(dot)net]
> > Sent: 17 March 2004 01:41
> > To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Subject: [HACKERS] Doxygen?
> >
> > I'll start posting the documentation I am generating to my
> > vanity site (announcements later), but would this be
> > something that the postgresql.org main site would be able to
> > host? It'll be a bunch of static HTML files.
>
> This is not something that should be on the main site, but on
> developer.postgresql.org. And yes, if there are no objections here then
> I see no reason why it cannot be added. I assume you will be able to
> keep it up to date?
>

I was thinking of writing a cron job to update the CVS tree and then build
the documentation (takes about 10 minutes on my computer). Then I could
push it to wherever you like. Are we currently maintaining two or three
branches in the code? We may want to keep them seperate.

We could also maintain released postgresql documentation -- IE, one set for
PostgreSQL 7.4.0, one set for PostgreSQL 7.4.1, etc... These would only
have to be built once.

--
Jonathan Gardner
jgardner(at)jonathangardner(dot)net

In response to

Responses

  • Re: Doxygen? at 2004-03-17 19:56:04 from Marc G. Fournier
  • Re: Doxygen? at 2004-03-18 01:54:53 from Christopher Kings-Lynne

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2004-03-17 19:03:10 Re: COPY formatting
Previous Message Jonathan Gardner 2004-03-17 18:42:03 Re: Doxygen?