| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever |
| Date: | 2004-03-17 01:37:32 |
| Message-ID: | 200403170137.i2H1bWA13193@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Where are we on this? It seems like a win to me.
>
> I thought it was a bad idea, although I no longer remember the details.
If I remember correctly, you didn't like the index routines reading the
tuple information, or something like that, but there was a performance
benefit for duplicate keys, so I think we should re-investigate this.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan Gardner | 2004-03-17 01:40:54 | Doxygen? |
| Previous Message | Jonathan Gardner | 2004-03-17 01:34:25 | Re: Topic for a student research project |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-17 01:55:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-17 01:29:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever |