Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Date: 2004-03-15 21:21:10
Message-ID: 20040315212110.GE2921@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:37:58AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> This also brings up the thought that if we do want to use pgfoundry.org,
> we'd better register pgfoundry.net and pgfoundry.com before someone
> else does.

And .info? And .biz? And whatever other unrestricted nonsense
things there are out there? (I know my employers would dearly love
everyone who has a name they want to protect to register it in every
registry on earth, but I have a feeling that if the industry gets its
way, that's going to become impractical soon.)

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The plural of anecdote is not data.
--Roger Brinner

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-03-15 21:24:31 Re: listening addresses
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2004-03-15 21:18:37 Re: WAL write of full pages

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-16 17:56:28 How do I make web site changes
Previous Message Justin Clift 2004-03-15 17:03:28 Re: [Fwd: postgres 7.3.1 init script error]