From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
Date: | 2004-03-15 21:21:10 |
Message-ID: | 20040315212110.GE2921@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:37:58AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> This also brings up the thought that if we do want to use pgfoundry.org,
> we'd better register pgfoundry.net and pgfoundry.com before someone
> else does.
And .info? And .biz? And whatever other unrestricted nonsense
things there are out there? (I know my employers would dearly love
everyone who has a name they want to protect to register it in every
registry on earth, but I have a feeling that if the industry gets its
way, that's going to become impractical soon.)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The plural of anecdote is not data.
--Roger Brinner
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-03-15 21:24:31 | Re: listening addresses |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2004-03-15 21:18:37 | Re: WAL write of full pages |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-16 17:56:28 | How do I make web site changes |
Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2004-03-15 17:03:28 | Re: [Fwd: postgres 7.3.1 init script error] |