Re: [HACKERS] notice about costly ri checks (3)

Thanks. Done.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] notice about costly ri checks (3)
> >
> > I hope you put version (4), not version (3)! Otherwise the new
> > wording is not the "new new one" discussed later...
>
> I just checked. You put version 3 in line (NOTICE, no precision about
> offending attributes), although a later discussion seemed to decide that a
> WARNING was better, and that attributes and types should be shown, hence
> version (4).
>
> So, if you can update, it would be better!
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience, have a nice day,
>
> --
> Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073