Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.
Date: 2004-03-12 04:34:03
Message-ID: 20040312003120.P98352@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:

> I think having a pgfoundry.postgresql.net/org is good, but it should
> have its own identity, pgfoundry.org for the main url gets my vote for
> what it's worth.

I like the shortness myself ...

IMHO, the domain name isn't the make/break of whether going to GForge will
succeed ... the success will be a matter of marketing it, and making sure
that its project are well known ... personally, focusing on the domain is
like focusing on the name of a car when you buy it, not on its features
and/or price ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-12 04:40:29 Re: Default Stats Revisited
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-12 04:32:44 Re: Performance and WAL on big inserts/updates

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-03-12 06:32:26 Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-03-12 04:29:50 Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs.