Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]

From: Alvaro Herrera Munoz <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]
Date: 2004-03-11 21:25:25
Message-ID: 20040311212525.GA5123@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 04:24:30PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> I think the idea of putting comments directly into pg_shadow and friends
> is too icky to consider, though. If we really wanted to support this
> stuff then we'd make *one* shared table that is just like
> pg_description, but is used for shared objects.

Hey, a pg_sdescription could be followed by a pg_sdepend to hold
dependency information for global objects (users ATM) ...

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"Las mujeres son como hondas: mientras ms resistencia tienen,
ms lejos puedes llegar con ellas" (Jonas Nightingale, Leap of Faith)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2004-03-11 21:45:02 Re: unsafe floats
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-11 20:29:29 Re: pgFoundry