Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Date: 2004-03-12 00:38:25
Message-ID: 200403111638.25116.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Jeroen,

> > Here's another idea: couldn't we have a subdomain for the projects, as in
> > "<project>.forge.postgresql.org"? Or would that be too long?

Hmmm ... wouldn't that be rather awkward with the projects with longer names?

http://orapgsqlviews.foundry.postgresql.org

That's 39 characters, not including the http ...

To speak up, I'd rather have either options (A) or (B) thank this option.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2004-03-12 00:47:37 Re: unsafe floats
Previous Message Fernando Nasser 2004-03-12 00:28:41 Log rotation

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-03-12 01:13:35 Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-12 00:16:41 Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org