Re: Default Stats Revisited

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Default Stats Revisited
Date: 2004-03-11 18:41:58
Message-ID: 200403111041.58014.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Scott,

> But possible more error prone. If you crank up the default statistics to
> 50, but the index default is still 25... OTOH, you could always have the
> setting of used for index default be whichever is greater... hmmm.

Well, I'm not 100% opposed to a multiplier. I'd like to take a poll of DBAs
to find out which they would find more accessable. But since most people
seem to be ignoring this thread, I'm not sure we'll get much response ...

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-11 18:42:32 Re: creating index on changed field type
Previous Message David Smith 2004-03-11 18:23:48 creating index on changed field type