Re: Select-Insert-Query

From: postgres(at)countup(dot)de
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Select-Insert-Query
Date: 2004-03-02 00:49:03
Message-ID: 20040302004903.DA8D55A816E@kserver17.erfurt12.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000" link="#000000" alink="#000000" vlink="#000000" marginwidth=10 marginheight=10 topmargin=10 leftmargin=10>Hi,
<br>
<br>nobody has an idea? :-(
<br>
<br>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
<br>Von: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] Im Auftrag von postgres(at)countup(dot)de
<br>Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Februar 2004 17:53
<br>An: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
<br>Betreff: [PERFORM] Select-Insert-Query
<br>
<br>Hi,
<br>
<br>what is the most performant way to select for example the first 99 rows of a table and insert them into another table...
<br>
<br>at the moment i do this:
<br>
<br>for userrecord in select * from table where account_id = a_account_id and counter_id = userrecord.counter_id and visitortable_id between a_minid and a_maxid limit 99 loop
<br>insert into lastusers (account_id, counter_id, date, ip, hostname) values(a_account_id,userrecord.counter_id,userrecord.date
,userrecord.ip,userrecord.hostname);
<br>end loop;
<br>
<br>i think "limit" is a performance killer, is that right? but what to do instead
<br>
<br>thanks
<br>bye
<br></body></html>

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/html 1.1 KB

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-02 01:01:29 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2004-03-02 00:27:51 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage