Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date
Date: 2004-02-29 21:49:06
Message-ID: 200402291349.07241.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-www
Neil,

> Frankly, I think the PostgreSQL project would be sending "the wrong 
> message" if we chose our tools on any basis other than functionality. 
> We ought to use what works, whether it supports PG or not. Whether the 
> bug tracker tool uses PostgreSQL, flat files or MS Access to store 
> data is entirely secondary to whether it serves the needs of the 
> development group.

OK, then, more substantial:   I personally lack confidence in any tool that 
uses an in-memory object database to store persistent data.   I also feel 
pessimistic about our ability to extend and integrate a tool which uses 
radically different storage mechanism than the other tools we're using.  
Finally, for any of these things I forsee asking the communites involved with 
those projects for help, and it seems foolish to beg for help (as would 
probably be required of a project that does nor support PG) when there are 
people offering to help us.

THIS JUST IN:  as if we didn't have enough options, Talli of the OpenACS 
community has offered their help with using OpenACS modules for any of the 
web tasks we've discussed.   More later.

-- 
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-02-29 22:22:05
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2004-02-29 21:26:01
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-02-29 22:22:05
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2004-02-29 21:26:01
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-02-29 22:22:05
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2004-02-29 21:26:01
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-02-29 22:22:05
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2004-02-29 21:26:01
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group