Re: psql variables

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql variables
Date: 2004-02-09 16:45:31
Message-ID: 200402091745.31365.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> Perhaps you're suggesting shell variables were used as the design
> model for psql's variables (although I can't be sure, you didn't
> elaborate). If so, what I'm saying is that this model is not very
> friendly for setting psql-internal options, and we'd be better
> changing it as I've elaborated on elsewhere. Do you agree?

Shell variables did serve as a design model, mostly because I found it
better to use *some* model rather than inventing behavior out of thin
air. Consequently, I am sort of biased on this.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Keith Bottner 2004-02-09 16:53:10 Re: RFC: Very large scale postgres support
Previous Message PG 2004-02-09 16:36:03 postmaster wedged