Re: PITR Dead horse?

Austin Gonyou wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 14:00, Nicolai Tufar wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk]
> > > My SQL2K servers give me far more sleepless nights than PostgreSQL
> > ever
> > > did!
> >
> > You bet! I totally agree with you.
> > Technicians like you, me and most people on this list
> > Already know that PostgreSQL is stable and reliable.
> > It is management that needs to be convinced, and for this
> > we need to have PITR in feature list.
> >
> > > Regards, Dave.
>
>
> As previously stated by Bruce I believe, the mindshare department needs
> some work. For this, the PITR is a necessity, but also when comparing
> features with other DBs that people and businesses are currently
> familiar with.

PITR is required to recover all data after total hardware failure. It
isn't just a mindshare issue.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073