From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: size of mailing lists? |
Date: | 2004-02-05 16:05:33 |
Message-ID: | 20040205120231.S4449@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, David Garamond wrote:
> Would someone mind divulging the size (= number of members) of the
> @postgreql.org mailing lists (particularly pgsql-general and
> pgsql-hackers)? To tell you the truth, I've always got good responses
> from this list. Apparently most other question posts do too. There seems
> to be always someone knowledgeable to answer questions, which is very
> very nice :-)
pgadmin-devteam 0 out of 5
pgadmin-hackers 0 out of 114
pgadmin-support 0 out of 303
pgsql-admin 0 out of 1470
pgsql-advocacy 0 out of 245
pgsql-announce 0 out of 2707
pgsql-benchmarks 0 out of 295
pgsql-bugs 0 out of 710
pgsql-chat 0 out of 149
pgsql-committers 0 out of 158
pgsql-cygwin 0 out of 373
pgsql-de-allgemein 0 out of 37
pgsql-docs 0 out of 449
pgsql-fr-generale 0 out of 30
pgsql-general 1 out of 1927
pgsql-hackers 1 out of 1093
pgsql-hackers-pitr 0 out of 0
pgsql-hackers-win32 0 out of 102
pgsql-interfaces 0 out of 849
pgsql-jdbc 0 out of 913
pgsql-jobs 0 out of 34
pgsql-novice 0 out of 1032
pgsql-odbc 0 out of 647
pgsql-patches 0 out of 332
pgsql-performance 0 out of 749
pgsql-php 0 out of 825
pgsql-ports 0 out of 271
pgsql-sql 0 out of 1361
pgsql-techdocs 0 out of 130
pgsql-tr-genel 0 out of 44
pgsql-www 0 out of 33
pgsql-www-advocacy 0 out of 6
pgsql-www-jobs 0 out of 11
pgsql-www-main 0 out of 7
press 0 out of 6
sfpug 0 out of 42
translators 0 out of 21
webmaster 0 out of 6
And, there are a total of 11918 unique addresses subscribed across those
lists ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rajesh Kumar Mallah | 2004-02-05 16:09:13 | Re: Functions in CHECK constraint not getting dumped before |
Previous Message | John Sidney-Woollett | 2004-02-05 16:00:12 | Re: dblink: rollback transaction |