Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64

From: George Essig <george_essig(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Dave Thompson <dave(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64
Date: 2004-01-27 17:52:36
Message-ID: 20040127175236.5176.qmail@web80203.mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> Hello All
>
> Just wanted to gather opinions on what file system has the best balance between performance and
> reliability when used on a quad processor machine running SuSE64. Thanks
>
> DAve

I was reading the article 'Behind the ALTIX 3000' in the Feb. 2003 Linux Journal, and it mentioned
the following paper which compares Ext2, Ext3, ReiserFS, XFS, and JFS:

Filesystem Performance and Scalability in Linux 2.4.17
Originally published in Proceedings of the FREENIX Track:
2002 USENIX Annual Technical Conference
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/papers/filesystem-perf-tm.pdf

Quoting the abtract:

Although the best-performing filesystem varies depending on the benchmark and system used, some
larger trends are evident in the data. On the smaller systems, the best-performing file system is
often Ext2, Ext3 or ReiserFS. For the larger systems and higher loads, XFS can provide the best
overall performance.

George Essig

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-01-27 18:52:21 pl/pgSQL versus pl/Python
Previous Message Alan Stange 2004-01-27 15:58:29 Re: Insert Times