From: | Jeff Eckermann <jeff_eckermann(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Abi Saab <RSaab(at)ccc(dot)gr>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Object Relational features in PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2004-01-26 15:03:40 |
Message-ID: | 20040126150340.69476.qmail@web20803.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
--- Robert Abi Saab <RSaab(at)ccc(dot)gr> wrote:
> So my question is whether there is (or will be) any
> support for (any of)
> the following:
>
> More flexible user defined types and support for
> these in tables
>
> Type inheritance
>
> REF and DEREF data types
>
> Nested tables
>
> Polymorphism and more flexible casting of objects
> (like the TREAT
> function, not only the ONLY function)
>
> Typed tables (create table X of type Y)
>
> Object views
>
> User defined functions (encapsulated in the body of
> a user defined type)
>
>
>
> I would be really thankful for any fast reply,
> because I need to report
> to the management whether a migration to PostgreSQL
> is both efficient
> and possible or not.
Out of curiosity, what makes these features
indispensable to your project? Are you seeking to
migrate from a DBMS that already supports those
features, and if so, what is that?
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | lnd | 2004-01-26 15:24:15 | Global variables for plpgsql stored procedures |
Previous Message | Jim Wilson | 2004-01-26 14:43:38 | Re: Casting varchar to interval.? |