| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "'PostgreSQL General'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New PostgreSQL search resource |
| Date: | 2004-01-19 17:57:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200401190957.54350.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-www |
Scott,
> "create unique index"
>
> "select distinct"
I believe that one does this by adding to the word root dictionary and
rebuilding the index. The problem is that then anything indexed as "select
distinct" shows up under searches for "select distinct" but not for
"distinct".
Try searching on SELECT & DISTINCT
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-01-19 18:21:58 | Re: New PostgreSQL search resource |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-01-19 17:38:04 | Re: New PostgreSQL search resource |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-01-19 18:18:29 | Re: Any real known bugs about wrong selects? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-19 17:57:40 | Re: importing data |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-01-19 18:21:58 | Re: New PostgreSQL search resource |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-01-19 17:40:31 | Re: Bricolage: Impressive |