| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql \d option list overloaded |
| Date: | 2004-01-11 01:07:25 |
| Message-ID: | 200401110207.26299.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> 2. Some people aren't using psql.
I don't see why this is an issue. People not using psql are either
using a GUI, which presumably supports plenty of "show" and "describe"
functionality, or they're writing their own program, in which case it
doesn't really matter how short or easy to remember the commands are.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-01-11 01:13:17 | Re: psql \d option list overloaded |
| Previous Message | Jon Jensen | 2004-01-11 00:16:58 | Re: psql \d option list overloaded |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-01-11 01:13:17 | Re: psql \d option list overloaded |
| Previous Message | Igor Shevchenko | 2004-01-11 00:54:05 | psql's "\d" and CLUSTER |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-01-11 01:13:17 | Re: psql \d option list overloaded |
| Previous Message | Jon Jensen | 2004-01-11 00:16:58 | Re: psql \d option list overloaded |