Claudio Natoli wrote:
> Tom Lane:
> > Per Jan's comment, there is no need to mess with the existing
> > datastructure. I'd think more of *copying* the dllist into some array
> > in shared memory. This is code that would only need to exist in the
> > Windows port.
> (I thought Jan was referring to the PGPROC struct)
> This just seems a little odd to me. I mean, they are going to be basically
> identical (they'll even use the same struct!).
Seems you should use an array of "struct bkend" or "Backend" as storage
in shared memory. I think the problem with Dllist is that it is
dynamically allocated and I don't see how that could be done cleanly in
shared memory. I think that's why the array idea seems best.
> Also, let's get back to why we want this: to handle processCancelRequest in
> the Win32 case. If this array is in Windows only, then we'll obviously need
> two implementations of the processCancelRequest logic.
> Or I'm missing something...
Looking up they key would have to be different for fork and fork/exec.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Claudio Natoli||Date: 2004-01-09 06:10:23|
|Subject: Re: fork/exec patch: pre-CreateProcess finalization|
|Previous:||From: Claudio Natoli||Date: 2004-01-09 05:52:45|
|Subject: Re: fork/exec patch: pre-CreateProcess finalization |