Re: PL/Java issues

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PL/Java issues
Date: 2004-01-05 17:49:37
Message-ID: 200401051849.37706.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Will we need to address this TODO item:
>
> . Add capability to create and call PROCEDURES
>
> before proceding to do PL/Java? It would add to the usefulness
> greatly, I should think. I'm not sure how hard it would be.

This should be relatively easy if you omit OUT parameters. Just treat
CALL foo(...) as SELECT foo(...) and throw away the result (or avoid
generating one).

For OUT parameters, we'd probably have to learn their full semantics
first.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-01-05 17:51:24 Re: Permissions and PGSQL
Previous Message Ben Clewett 2004-01-05 17:15:06 UNSUBSCRIBE

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2004-01-05 20:11:47 Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE and ResultSet
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2004-01-05 01:00:37 Re: [JDBC] PL/Java issues