| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, ezra epstein <ee_newsgroup_post(at)prajnait(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: website doc search is extremely SLOW |
| Date: | 2004-01-05 09:48:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20040105054644.B28998@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
> > These results seem pretty good to me...
>
> FWIW, I see pretty decent search speed when I go to
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.cgi
> but pretty lousy search speed when I try a similar query at
> http://archives.postgresql.org/
>
> Could we get the latter search engine cranked up?
Odd ... I'm doing all my searches using archives ... note that both use
the same backend database, so the only thing I can think of is that when
you use search.cgi, its not including everything on http://archives.*,
which will cut down the # of URLs found by ~300k out of 390k ... smaller
result set ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Travers | 2004-01-05 10:16:23 | Re: History-based (or logged) database. |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2004-01-05 08:27:45 | Re: website doc search is extremely SLOW |