Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: david(at)fetter(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Date: 2003-12-17 07:00:03
Message-ID: 200312170800.03622.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > Peter indicated it was not valid docbook and wanted only the
> > > relivant parts, but it looked OK to me. Peter?
> >
> > That's what I said, that's what I meant.
>
> Well, I can't see anything wrong with the SGML, and you are not
> telling me what is wrong, so I guess I will just apply it and find
> out where the SGML build fails.

This patch is already taken care of.

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-12-17 07:07:03 Re: Unix timestamp -> timestamp, per Tom Lane :)
Previous Message Christopher Murtagh 2003-12-17 06:22:22 restore error - language "plperlu" is not trusted