Re: 7.4 include file conflict

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, aspeitia(at)sells(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.4 include file conflict
Date: 2003-12-16 19:01:51
Message-ID: 200312161901.hBGJ1pJ04034@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > Well, it is not really an ecpg file, but one needed for compatibility.
> > And, yes, Peter is correct, this file may be included directly by some
> > apps.
>
> I was under the impression that this issue had already been resolved
> among you, Lamar, and the Red Hat packaging people. Aren't we going to
> install ecpg's headers into $(includedir)/ecpg instead of $(includedir)?

Maybe that fixes the Red Hat issue, but we have the Cygwin issue with
Win32's sqltypes.h, and there is the issue for other platforms, no? Is
that install change going to be for all platforms?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2003-12-16 19:08:44 Re: 7.4 include file conflict
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2003-12-16 18:25:29 Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade