On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 05:19:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Baden <lindysandiego(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Hi there. My install was failing the regression tests
> > due to a shared memory error.
>
> After reviewing the proposed patch, I find it hard to believe that the
> patch would have fixed any such problem --- even if key_t is 64 bits
> on your system, the code should still have worked, because we'd never
> have selected a key value wider than 32 bits anyway. What *exact*
> misbehavior were you seeing?
It's not the key (key_t) that is the problem, but the size, which
used to be int but got replaced by a size_t.
Kurt