Re: pg_restore and create FK without verification check

From: ow <oneway_111(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_restore and create FK without verification check
Date: 2003-11-27 00:00:05
Message-ID: 20031127000005.60161.qmail@web21408.mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


--- Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> wrote:
> Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >IIRC, he was. I think the thing causing the difference between his times
> >and the ones we saw typically when doing the tests was that he didn't have
> >an index on the fktable's referencing column.
> >
> >
>
> A common mistake, can't count how often I created this one...

Wrong. It's a mistake to think that you always HAVE to have an index on FK
column. See the links below for more details:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2003-11/msg00317.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2003-11/msg00319.php

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-11-27 00:00:40 Re: Limiting factors of pg_largeobject
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-26 23:55:35 Re: pg_restore and create FK without verification check