| From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Release cycle length |
| Date: | 2003-11-26 04:25:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20031126042534.GA23015@libertyrms.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:08:44PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Has anyone looked at using replication as a migration method? If
Looked at? Sure. Heck, I've done it. Yes, it works. Is it
painless? Well, that depends on whether you think using erserver is
painless. ;-) It's rather less downtime than pg_dump | psql, I'll
tell you.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-11-26 04:27:46 | Re: [PERFORM] More detail on settings for pgavd? |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-11-26 02:52:21 | Re: Function parameter names |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-11-26 08:08:24 | Re: gforge |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-11-25 22:57:35 | Re: Error with archives fixed ... |